Microservice Architecture - The Future Proofed Architecture
Microservice architecture is becoming increasingly popular among businesses as it helps to break down large applications into smaller, more manageable components. This makes maintaining and updating individual components easier while reducing complexity and cost.
In this article, we will explore the key characteristics of microservice architecture and discuss some of the benefits and challenges of adopting this approach.
But first - Need help from a microservice implementation specialist? Our team can help plan and implement your headless eCommerce or composable architecture application. Drop us a line! The worst that can happen is you get some free experience-backed advice.
What exactly is a microservice architecture?
Microservice architecture is a software design approach in which an application is built as a suite of small, independent services. Each microservice is designed to handle a specific business capability and can be developed, deployed, and maintained independently of the other services. This approach is often used for building complex, scalable applications composed of multiple components.
Although self-contained, the microservices communicate with each other through well-defined interfaces, typically using lightweight protocols such as HTTP. This enables the application to function as a single unit. There are a variety of different technologies and tools that can be used for communication between microservices. For example, some common options include REST APIs, gRPC, and message brokers such as Apache Kafka or RabbitMQ.
The choice of technology and tooling will depend on the application and the organization's specific requirements and constraints. For example, factors that may influence the decision include the type and amount of data being exchanged, the performance and scalability requirements, and the level of reliability and security needed.
Read how we helped AFTCO implement a wildly successful microservice-based headless Shopify store that turbo-charged their page load times.
Characteristics of a Microservice architecture
1. Reusability
In a microservice architecture, each service is designed to be self-contained and independent, with a specific and well-defined purpose. This allows services to be easily shared and reused across different applications, which can help to improve the overall efficiency and productivity of the development process.
For example, imagine that a team has developed a service that handles user authentication and authorization for an e-commerce application. This service could be designed so that it could be easily reused in other applications requiring user authentication and authorization. This would allow the team to focus on developing the new application's core functionality rather than spending time and resources on developing and testing the authentication and authorization functionality from scratch.
2. Scalable
Because each service in a microservice architecture is independent and isolated from the others, it can be scaled up or down independently to meet changing demands. This means that if one service becomes heavily used, it can be scaled up by adding more instances of the service without affecting the other services in the application. Similarly, if a service is not being heavily used, it can be scaled down to reduce resource usage.
This scalable approach allows teams to optimize the performance and availability of the overall application by allocating resources to the services that need them the most. Additionally, because each service can be scaled independently, it can be easier to troubleshoot performance issues and identify the specific service causing the problem.
3. Event-driven
Another key characteristic of a microservice architecture is that it is event-driven. This means that services communicate with each other through events rather than through direct requests.
In an event-driven architecture, a service will publish an event when it has completed a certain action. Other services interested in that action can subscribe to and respond to the event. For example, suppose a service that processes orders receives a new order. In that case, it might publish an "order_received" event, and other services that need to respond to the new order, such as a service that sends confirmation emails or updates inventory, can subscribe to the event and take the appropriate action.
This event-driven approach has several benefits. First, it allows for loose coupling between services, which makes the overall application more resilient to change. If one service is updated or changed, it will not necessarily affect the other services because they are not directly connected. This can make the application easier to maintain and evolve.
Second, an event-driven architecture can improve the application's scalability because services can respond to events asynchronously. This means that a service that publishes an event does not have to wait for the other services to respond before it can continue processing. This can help improve the application's overall performance because it allows different services to work in parallel.
4. Decentralized data management
One of the key characteristics of a microservice architecture is decentralized data management. This means each service manages its own data and has its database. As such, each service is responsible for storing, retrieving, and updating its data rather than relying on a centralized database that is shared by all the services in the application.
This decentralized approach to data management allows each service to be scaled independently because the data for each service is managed by that service itself. This can improve the overall performance and availability of the application.
It also allows each service to use the most appropriate data storage technology for specific requirements. For example, one service might use a relational database, while another might use a NoSQL database. This flexibility can improve the overall performance and maintainability of the application.
In addition, decentralized data management allows teams to develop and maintain each service independently. This can improve the overall agility of the development process.
5. Polyglot
Microservice architecture is polyglot, meaning each service can be implemented using a different programming language or technology stack, depending on the specific requirements of the service. This allows teams to choose the right tools for the job, which helps improve the application's overall performance and maintainability. The polyglot attribute of a microservice architecture also makes it easier to integrate with a wide range of external systems and technologies.
Advantages of a microservice architecture
There are several advantages to using a microservice architecture, including the following:
1. Improved agility
Each service is independent and has its codebase, data store, and deployment cycle. This is known as autonomy - it allows teams to work on their services without being constrained by the dependencies and constraints of other services.
Also, each service is typically managed by a separate team responsible for all aspects of their service, including development, testing, deployment, and maintenance. This allows teams to have more control over their services, and it also allows them to iterate quickly and release new versions of their services without having to coordinate with other teams. Consequently, it helps improve the overall agility of the development process and makes it easier to respond to changing business needs.
2. Increased flexibility
Each service can be managed independently, allowing teams to optimize the application's resources and capacity to meet the business's changing needs. Additionally, it is easier to replace or modify a service without disrupting the overall functionality of the application.
3. Better maintainability
In a microservice architecture, each service is small and focused, which makes it easier to understand and maintain. Additionally, because each service is independently managed, teams can make changes to their service without coordinating with other teams, which can help reduce the risk of conflicts and dependencies.
4. Enhanced resilience
In a microservice architecture, the failure of one service should not cause the entire application to fail. Other services continue to operate, and the failed service can be restarted or replaced without disrupting the application's overall functionality.
5. High cohesion
One of the advantages of using a microservice architecture is that it promotes high cohesion, which means that all of the components and logic related to a specific aspect of the application should be contained within the service. This makes it easier to understand and maintain the service and helps improve the overall quality and stability of the application.
6. Increased security
Microservice architecture is more secure because it allows for more fine-grained control over the security of individual services. You can implement each component with its security controls and policies.
Monolithic vs. microservice architecture
To truly appreciate a microservice architecture, it makes sense to compare it with a monolithic architecture. A monolithic architecture refers to a software design approach in which an entire software application is built as a single, autonomous unit. This means that all components of the application are tightly coupled; as such, they're interdependent and cannot function independently.
As we discuss the comparison between monolithic and microservice architectures, keep in mind that we’re not comparing a simple WordPress store with a 100,000 user microservice-based application. We’re assuming that the implementation case is quite large and complex.
Difficult to maintain
One major disadvantage of monolithic architecture is that it can make the application difficult to maintain and update as the application grows in complexity. Because all of the components are tightly packed together, any changes or updates to one part of the application can have unintended consequences for other parts of the application. This can make implementing new features or fixing bugs challenging without potentially breaking other application parts.
Scalability issues
Another disadvantage of monolithic architecture is that it can make the application difficult to scale. Because all components are tightly coupled, the entire application must be deployed and run as a single unit. If one part of the application is experiencing high demand, the entire application must be scaled up to accommodate the increased load. This can be costly and inefficient, especially in large and complex applications.
Additionally, monolithic architecture can make it difficult to reuse code or components across different applications. Because all components are tightly coupled, they cannot be easily extracted and used in other applications. This can make it challenging to leverage existing code and components and result in duplication of effort and prolonged development time.
Disadvantages of a microservice architecture
Although microservice architecture offers a modern way of building applications, it has disadvantages. They include:
Increased complexity
Microservice architecture can be more complex to implement and manage than monolithic architecture. It can be challenging to ensure all services work together seamlessly and to troubleshoot problems when they arise. Additionally, the increased number of services can make it even more challenging to maintain a consistent user experience across the entire application.
Difficulty in testing and deployment
Monolithic architecture is easier to test and deploy than microservice architecture. This is because each service must be tested and deployed independently, which can be time-consuming and error-prone. Additionally, because services are independent and can be developed by different teams, there may be more variation in the quality and reliability of individual services, which can impair the overall quality and reliability of the application.
Expensive to implement
Microservice architecture can be more expensive to implement and maintain than monolithic architecture. This is because it typically requires more infrastructure and support, such as more servers and additional tools for managing and coordinating the services. Additionally, using multiple services can result in increased network traffic and communication overhead, which can impact performance and add to the overall cost of the application.
Want to know exactly how expensive your project would be to implement with a microservice architecture? Reach out to our team and we'll help you work through an estimate.
Frequently asked questions
1. What is microservice architecture?
Microservice architecture is a software design pattern in which a large application is built as a collection of small, independent services. Each service is designed to be modular and to handle a specific function or set of related functions, and the services can be deployed and scaled independently of one another.
2. Why use a microservice architecture?
Microservice architectures offer several advantages over monolithic architectures, including improved scalability, flexibility, and reliability. Because each service is independently deployable, it's easier to scale specific services to meet the changing demands of the application and to replace or update individual services without affecting the entire system.
3. How does a microservice architecture differ from a monolithic architecture?
In a monolithic architecture, an application is built as a single, large codebase that includes all of the application's features and components. In contrast, a microservice architecture involves breaking the application into smaller, independent services that can be developed and deployed independently. This allows for greater flexibility and scalability, as well as the ability to use different technologies for different services.
Wrapping up
Overall, microservice architecture is a modern approach to building applications that involves breaking a large, monolithic application into smaller, independent services that can be developed, tested, and deployed independently. This architecture offers several benefits, including increased scalability, flexibility, and the ability to use different technologies for different services. It also allows for easier maintenance and faster deployment time. However, it can be expensive and complicated to implement, in addition to difficulties in managing the many services involved.
Did you enjoy this article? Visit our blog for more!
